Posted on May 29, 2010 by billcarney
Well, maybe somebody at CBC has a plan after all. CBC announced yesterday a joint ad deal with the National Post, then turned around to be a content provider for Roger’s various platforms. Would be nice if the people’s network shared its plans with its shareholders, the people. Still, looks like some signs of corporate creativity from what has long been criticized as a dull, unimaginative crown corporate bureaucracy. More details please.
Reuters, May 28 2010
Filed under: CBC, New media | Tagged: Rogers | Leave a comment »
Posted on May 28, 2010 by billcarney
Well, it’s not exactly a merger of the strong, but two of the weakest (financially) media outlets have signed an agreement offering each of its clients access, presumably at a discount, to the others advertising. Since Global is no longer part of the CanWest empire, it doesn’t provide a conflict, but it is odd of CBC to hitch its post to a dying star. Yes, Paul Godfrey is convinced of the viability of the Post, but he could have picked a stronger partner, like CTV, which has never lacked for money or leverage.
National Post, May 27 2010
Filed under: CBC, National Post | Tagged: advertising deal | Leave a comment »
Posted on May 21, 2010 by billcarney
Masthead, counting online line as well as traditional magazines, finds that the difference between new launches and dead magazines is -20, the first time in a decade that magazine world has lost more titles than it has gained. Of all traditional media, magazines with their long lead times have found it the hardest to compete with the web.
J-Source, May 17 2010
Filed under: magazines, Uncategorized | Tagged: losing mag titles | Leave a comment »
Posted on May 11, 2010 by billcarney
Here are some thoughts, gratis, on how you might make the newspapers of the former CanWest viable again, economically and journalistically.
1. Kill the National Post. While I have long argued about the need for various media voices, in this case the gangrenous NP needs to be amputated before it infects the rest of the newspaper group. Bay Street has been advising this since 1998; maybe they know what they’re talking about.
2. Fire everyone above the title of publisher in the newspaper division. These are the same people responsible taking CanWest into bankruptcy. Keep the local management in place, since it seems to be making money locally.
3. Your business model is not convergence; that failed everywhere ten years ago. Look to the Southam model, successful for 150 years, of local newspapers run locally to respond to local demand. If they are responsive locally, and profitable locally, everyone wins.
4. Forget about “economies of scale” where ridiculous things were done in the name of efficiency like trying to centralize everything in one place; e.g. one travel desk, one foreign desk, one arts desk. The Asia-centric concerns of the BC papers are going to be radically different from the government-concerns of Ottawa.
5. You can still have national columnists, the way the old Southam had writers like Charles Lynch. If they’ve got something of interest to day, local newspapers can decide whether to include them or not.
6. Rejoin CP. OK, not much of an economic argument here, but since CP has fallen on hard times since CanWest left, the least you can do is bring back our only national wire service by coming back to it.
As I develop or hear of any other ideas which will help you, I will be sure to pass them on.
Filed under: CanWest | Tagged: buyout | 2 Comments »
Posted on May 11, 2010 by billcarney
The dread of convergence hangs over the “new” CanWest whose newspapers have been bought out by a consortium led by National Post publisher Paul Godfrey. Here’s some of the language that’s making me nervous:
“An integrated, multi-platform news and information company
Our potent brands are composed of a pan-Canadian mix of major metro newspapers, the National Post, a wealth of superb digital properties and community newspapers.
This Canadian solution has limitless potential and will prove to be most rewarding for all of our stakeholders.”
Eh? Why don’t we go the whole nine yards on cliched business/convergence bafflegab and talk about “leveraging content by launching from multiple media platforms.”
Godfrey et al plan to take this public in a few months. Who would invest in a company with a history of taking its stock from $22 a share to 22 cents a share, and bankruptcy, particularly when it espouses the same business “strategy” that blew it up in the first place?
Filed under: CanWest, Uncategorized | Tagged: buyout | Leave a comment »
Posted on May 10, 2010 by billcarney
Stats Can released a report today that the use of the Internet by Canadians continues to rise, from 73 per cent of Canadians in2007 to 80 per cent in 2009. The West leads the way, with Calgary and Saskatoon at 89 per cent, and Edmonton, Victoria and Ottawa Hull at 86 per cent. Youth continues to be the lead user, followed by seniors who are slowly adapting to the web. A plethora of stats follow, and you can click on the CTV summary below or the full Stats Can report. Didn’t see much about platforms: are people accessing the web on their cell, Ipod, Blackberry, work, school or home computer.
CTV, May 10 2010
Stats Can, May 10 2010
Filed under: Internet, Recent research, Uncategorized | Tagged: Canadian use of | Leave a comment »
Posted on May 7, 2010 by billcarney
Today the Supreme Court ruled 8 – 1 that the National Post doesn’t have a blanket right to protect a journalistic source, citing the need for other rights, like the right of a publicly accused person to defend him, to supercede confidentiality. It’s not as sweeping or definitive as its ruling last December on defamation, but it makes clear that journalists can’t assume confidentiality of sources, and that future cases will be determined on a case by case basis, juggling the right to protect a source from other rights. CBC has a nice summary, and if you’re really keen, I’ve linked to the ruling itself.
CBC, May 7 2010
Supreme Court, May 7 2010
Filed under: Media Law, Protection of sources, Uncategorized | Tagged: Supreme Court ruling | 1 Comment »